Skip to main content

Methodology

Editorial standards, source hierarchy and corrections

What the record is, what the record is not, and how DieselMandate.com corrects itself when it is wrong.


Editorial purpose

DieselMandate.com documents the legal, mechanical, economic and national-security case for repealing or fundamentally revising federal diesel-emissions mandates. Advocacy does not permit factual inaccuracy. Every factual claim must be traceable to Rob Carpenter's reporting or a primary government, court, legislative or regulatory source.

Source standard

Primary federal, court and legislative records receive priority: United States Code, the Code of Federal Regulations, the Federal Register, EPA rulemaking and enforcement records, filed indictments, plea agreements, judgments, sentencing records, consent decrees, presidential clemency warrants, congressional records, GAO and SBA filings.

Rob Carpenter's published reporting is used to organize and interpret the primary record. Wikipedia is not a final cited source; AI output is not cited.

Legal-status standard

Criminal conviction, presidential pardon, civil settlement, consent decree and federal disqualification are treated as separate legal events. A pardon of one defendant does not terminate a civil consent decree governing a different party. A change in Department of Justice prosecutorial policy is not a repeal of the underlying statute.

Where a legal status has not been independently verified against a primary source, this site displaysAwaiting primary-source verificationrather than a guess.

Corrections

Material factual corrections are dated and preserved.

Development-data correction · 2026-07-10

Kory Willis pardon status

An earlier development version of this website incorrectly described Kory Willis as pardoned. Willis was not included in the identified diesel-emissions pardon group. The record has been corrected to distinguish his criminal conviction from the separate civil consent decree governing PPEI covered products, inventory, technical support, warranties, marketing, customer notices, training and associated intellectual property. The consent decree was not automatically terminated by any other person's pardon or by a change in DOJ prosecutorial policy.

Contact

Editor: Rob Carpenter. Send corrections, tips and document submissions to robreportnews@pm.me.

Why we cite sources that support the Clean Air Act

An advocacy site that only cites the strongest arguments on its own side is not a factual record. The research library deliberately includes the leading scholarly synthesis supporting the Act, EPA's own cost-benefit study, the environmental movement's strongest published case and the agency's plain-English explainer. The diesel argument on this site must be able to be tested against them.

Sources we deliberately include on the other side

Peer-reviewed research· 2022Supports Clean Air Act

Looking Back at 50 Years of the Clean Air Act

Joseph E. Aldy, Maximilian Auffhammer, Maureen Cropper, Arthur Fraas, Richard Morgenstern — National Bureau of Economic Research / Journal of Economic Literature

Strongest scholarly case that the Act worked

Verification: Verified academic source