Skip to main content

Enforcement record

Cases and matters — matrix

Criminal, civil, consent-decree, pardon and policy matters are tracked separately. Unknown dates read 'Not verified' until a primary source is confirmed.


Loading the record…

Manufacturer enforcement

OEM and manufacturer enforcement

Federal Clean Air Act enforcement against engine and vehicle manufacturers. Tracked separately from the independent tuner / small-shop criminal defendants above. Unlike financial categories (civil penalty, criminal penalty, remediation, mitigation, recall/buyback) are not combined unless the government source itself supplies a combined total. Partial totals are labeled known minimum resolution value.

ManufacturerYearConductEngines or vehiclesCivil penaltyCriminal penaltyRemediation or mitigationKnown minimum totalSource
Caterpillar
+ 5 co-defendants
1998Use of electronic engine controls acting as defeat devices under the Clean Air Act, disabling or reducing NOx emission controls under highway cruise conditions.Heavy-duty diesel engines manufactured by seven engine makers, alleged to have used defeat devices that turned down NOx controls during highway cruise operation.$83.4 million combined civil penaltyNot verifiedRebuild, retrofit and non-road engine offset programs requiredKnown minimum resolution value: More than $1 billion in total settlement obligationsU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
+1 more
Cummins Inc.2024Installation of defeat devices and undisclosed auxiliary emission control devices on engines certified for RAM heavy-duty pickup trucks.Approximately one million model-year 2013–2019 RAM 2500 and 3500 pickup trucks equipped with Cummins engines.$1.675 billion civil penalty (largest Clean Air Act civil penalty on record)Not verifiedMore than $325 million in remediation obligationsKnown minimum resolution value not aggregated by government sourceU.S. Department of Justice, Office of Public Affairs
+1 more
Hino Motors Ltd.2025Multi-year scheme to submit false emission-test data to EPA and CARB, obtaining engine certifications for engines that did not meet applicable standards.Approximately 105,000 U.S.-market heavy-duty diesel engines model years 2010–2019.Not verifiedGuilty plea to federal fraud charges (financial component pooled into resolution)Not aggregatedKnown minimum resolution value: More than $1.6 billion combined criminal fines, civil penalties, forfeiture and mitigationU.S. Department of Justice, Office of Public Affairs
+1 more
Volkswagen AG
+ 2 co-defendants
Light-duty diesel context
2017Long-running scheme to install defeat devices in 2.0L and 3.0L diesel vehicles that concealed emissions of oxides of nitrogen far above legal limits during on-road operation.Approximately 590,000 model-year 2009–2016 U.S. light-duty diesel vehicles (2.0L and 3.0L).$1.5 billion in civil penalties and injunctive relief$2.8 billion criminal penaltyNot aggregatedKnown minimum resolution value: $4.3 billion combined criminal and civil resolutionU.S. Department of Justice, Office of Public Affairs
+1 more
Daimler AG
+ 1 co-defendants
Light-duty diesel context
2020Alleged use of undisclosed auxiliary emission control devices that reduced NOx controls under real-world driving.Approximately 250,000 model-year 2009–2016 Mercedes-Benz light-duty diesel vehicles and Sprinter vans.Not verifiedNot verifiedNot aggregatedKnown minimum resolution value: Approximately $1.5 billion combined civil penalty, mitigation and consumer reliefU.S. Department of Justice, Office of Public Affairs
+1 more
FCA US LLC
Light-duty diesel context
2022Conspiracy to defraud the United States and to violate the Clean Air Act by concealing auxiliary emission control devices in EcoDiesel light-duty vehicles.Approximately 100,000 model-year 2014–2016 RAM 1500 and Jeep Grand Cherokee light-duty diesel vehicles.Not verifiedMore than $300 million criminal penaltyNot aggregatedKnown minimum resolution value not aggregated by government sourceU.S. Department of Justice, Office of Public Affairs
Navistar Inc.2015Alleged introduction into commerce of heavy-duty diesel engines that did not comply with applicable NOx emission standards.Heavy-duty diesel engines manufactured after applicable NOx standards took effect but built to prior-tier certifications.$52 million civil penaltyNot verifiedSeparate mitigation obligationsKnown minimum resolution value not aggregated by government sourceU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Detroit Diesel Corporation2017Alleged introduction into commerce of model-year 2010 heavy-duty diesel engines that were not covered by valid EPA certificates of conformity for the model year.Approximately 7,700 model-year 2010 heavy-duty diesel engines sold after applicable NOx standards took effect.$14 million civil penaltyNot verified$14.5 million in mitigation projectsKnown minimum resolution value: $28.5 million combined civil penalty and mitigationU.S. Environmental Protection Agency

OEM matters are federal Clean Air Act enforcement actions against manufacturers. They are not combined with independent tuner defendants in a single undifferentiated table.